Skip to content

docs: qualify closeout recovery and select the next guard cost slice - #8288

Merged
huangruiteng merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/small-kernel-wheel-qualification-20261107
Nov 7, 2026
Merged

huangruiteng merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/small-kernel-wheel-qualification-20261107

Conversation

@cocolord

@cocolord cocolord commented Nov 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Goal And Delivered Outcome

The archived original-Turn closeout repair in #8264 is merged and independently reviewed. Both RFC checkpoints record source/wheel qualification: a 101-Todo delivery survives automatic archival and a controlled Effect stop with its accepted artifact, first completion time, four committed receipts and one debit.

The guard investigation now rejects simple Monitor import deferral as the next cost slice: it removes only one of 503 loaded modules and leaves 89 traced calls. A source-only composition of #8286 at efce6cb9c and #8290 at 9537687be preserves four complete File/SQLite base/overlay lifecycles and reduces JSON parameters by 6.95% / 6.93%, while the guard still loads 503 modules. The largest remaining payloads come from the existing Todo context, quota-planning and vision-wait projections, which now define the bounded source-reuse investigation.

  • Written by: model_agent, GPT-6 (OpenAI)

Implemented against

  • Specification: docs/architecture/rfcs/monorepo-distribution-split-v0.md, archived-closeout and guard-cost checkpoints.
  • Runtime baseline: 32167518b3c2646fd9b6a3a6e0aaf74b258a7b70; documentation head 76cdf88f5ad26c3fbe4bc00749d5286abeef887d.
Criterion Disposition Evidence
Reviewed archived-closeout repair survives monolithic source/wheel recovery qualified for the bounded CLI episode Four 101-Todo File/SQLite × source/wheel runs; original evidence/time, four receipts, one debit and controlled Effect restart
Guard loading has a demonstrated next target characterized Normal-bytecode guard loads 503 modules; deferred Monitor imports remove only one; actual guard admission/history reads retain the other dependencies
Existing context-transport candidates compose on the complete source path source-only qualification Four 101-Todo File/SQLite × base/overlay episodes, 91 Python and 20 TypeScript cases; temporary candidate paths restored
Smaller parameters prove latency or whole-task benefit unqualified Single instrumented observations; modules stay at 503; no matched unprofiled or model/adoption qualification

Scope And Continuation

This is bilingual documentation of the merged repair and bounded diagnosis; it adds no production implementation. The finite closeout/characterization question is answered. The next slice investigates one canonical Todo source-read/projection transaction under the existing typed owners, preserving full reads, source/provider revisions, actor/lease fences, pause/gates, pending intents and archive/replay lineage. More leaf RPCs or lossy source-field pruning cannot qualify it. #8123's existing Goal-route work and unresolved performance holds remain separate.

The broader milestone retains I3 for at least one minor release, M1/#8011, full R0/V10/R1, context/model and split installation, D2/D5/D6/D3, actual adoption and complete-cost gaps. The #8286/#8290 overlay neither grants merge authority nor qualifies a combined wheel or installed host.

Validation

  • Tested runtime: baseline above; prior source/wheel qualification and normal-bytecode profiles at 6c10e61ad; temporary candidate overlay at the exact heads above.
  • Tested documentation revision: 76cdf88f5ad26c3fbe4bc00749d5286abeef887d.
  • Run state: finished
  • Input classes: synthetic
Check kind Result Public-safe evidence / limitation
real_entrypoint passed Source console and isolated monolithic-wheel console for reviewed closeout; complete original-Turn replay and final settled guard
real_backend passed Isolated File/default SQLite; original evidence/time and once-only settlement through owned Effect stops
real_entrypoint passed Five original guard/reader profiling episodes and two-provider settled/closed/sibling/formal-pause Monitor checks; four new base/overlay source episodes
regression_parity passed Archive-pointer parser accepts emitted pointers and refuses unexpected prose/mismatched markers; evidence replacement and settled execution remain refusals
regression_parity passed Combined candidate source: 91 focused Python cases and 20 TypeScript cases, zero skips
diagnostic rejected as next slice Monitor import counterfactual: 503 to 502 modules, unchanged 89 traced calls; temporary wrapper has no production identity qualification
diagnostic observed SQLite JSON parameters 1,904,862 to 1,772,448; File 1,903,569 to 1,771,587. Headers/retries/responses/startup/service CPU are outside this count
static passed Staged and committed bilingual diff checks; DCO and diff hygiene
static passed Standard premerge at final head: four direct checks, two catalog canaries, eight risk smokes and public-boundary scan; zero failures/warnings/manual holds
manual passed English/Chinese semantic parity and exact aggregate readback; historical failed experiments and earlier probe failures remain separate

A controlled stop after committed settlement does not establish abrupt crash or model-host V4 recovery. The frozen paired cost studies remain unchanged. Profiling and parameter reductions do not establish latency, complete cost or long-horizon benefit. Temporary probes, candidate overlays, raw results and wheels remain private. New PostgreSQL, Windows, host-upgrade and model-host runs are outside this documentation increment; the next implementation retains affected-backend real-path requirements.

Frontend / Visual Evidence

  • UI impact: none; RFC checkpoint content only, with no product UI or documentation chrome change.
  • First viewport and preview: N/A.

Type of Change

  • Documentation update

LoopX Area

  • Public docs or presentation surface

Technical Direction

  • S2 typed kernel/durable authority; existing monorepo-distribution R0/R1/V4 qualification boundary.

Shared-authority RFC fixture impact

This records existing qualification and changes no migration, authority, provider routing or compatibility projection.

Boundary Checklist

  • No private state, raw results, credentials or local paths committed.
  • Both RFC mirrors changed; committed bilingual gate passed.
  • UI impact is none.
  • Commits include DCO sign-off.

Signed-off-by: lusendong.6789 <lusendong.6789@bytedance.com>
Co-authored-by: TRAE CLI <traecli@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: lusendong.6789 <lusendong.6789@bytedance.com>
Co-authored-by: TRAE CLI <traecli@bytedance.com>
@cocolord cocolord changed the title docs: qualify archived closeout in source and wheel docs: record archived closeout recovery and guard cost diagnosis Nov 7, 2026
loopx-agent
loopx-agent previously approved these changes Nov 7, 2026

@loopx-agent loopx-agent left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer: model_agent | gpt-6.1-sol | OpenAI | runtime_reported | reasoning_effort=max

本轮没有阻塞发现。[P3] 建议在性能表旁补一条公开可复现的缓存与插桩配置。单独使用 -B 仍会读取有效的 .pyc,空缓存前缀才改变本次对照中的读取结果。说明各组的缓存前缀、写入开关、预热条件和跟踪入口,可以让后续调查复用这些数字的口径。 字节码表

动机 / Motivation

这份记录供维护归档恢复、分发和 quota 加载的维护者判断下一步。原大状态比较在扣账后以 todo_archived 拒绝终结。合入的修复允许同一已验收结果继续完成原轮次。独立复验的四种组合均恢复了原证据、首次完成时间和四份回执,每组扣账一次。 本次核对范围是单体分发的受控恢复和诊断,完整 V4、R1 和 V10 验收仍待实测。突发中断、实际模型宿主采用和匹配条件下的完整成本仍需各自的验证。

按 docs/architecture/rfcs/monorepo-distribution-split-v0.md 在 32167518b3c2646fd9b6a3a6e0aaf74b258a7b70 的 Document map and maintenance contract 核对。追加的是非规范性的执行记录。V4 的真实模型宿主中断恢复、R1 的分发验收以及 V10 的匹配成本比较保留为待验证事项。 基线 RFC

改动思路 / Approach

在原双语台账里补齐 #8264 已合入后的源码和 wheel 证据,并沿用原来对失败样本的分类。后续剖析用于决定先检查哪些导入和共享请求。插桩开销、导入累计时间和请求耗时都按各自口径保留,全文没有把这些单次数据换算成净提速或数据库 CPU。

具体改动 / Changes

  • 归档终结条目准确引用了 #8264 的独立批准和已合入提交。我从实际源码 console 和新建的隔离 wheel 分别跑过 File、SQLite 的 101 个 Todo 场景。停止夹具所属 Effect 进程后,原终结可以继续,前后替换 evidence 都被拒绝。 归档条目 · 修复评审
  • 诊断条目新增 guard 和 Monitor 两类对照。已结算及关闭后回放在两种存储上都保留原身份和一次 poll、零扣账。另一个到期任务在新轮次才被选中。用 configure-goal --quota-compute 0 复验,原轮次返回 quota_skip。 回放条目
  • 两份文档的 12 行计时、请求数及模块数一致,历史冻结比较的八个失败仍保留。运行时代码和合并目标一致。 中文条目

对主干的风险 / Risks

真实复验覆盖了受控重启、证据替换、原回执回放和正确的暂停入口。第一次用独立进程等待退出的探针得到 shutdown_pending。调整为先确认服务退场,再用系统进程列表验证原进程退出,四组重启和恢复均通过。源码和 wheel 都接受生成的归档指针,拒绝标记区里的外来正文与错配标记。

53 项针对性测试通过,双语检查及公开边界扫描通过。初次 quick 的全树语义检查超时,在相同限时下重跑后,4 项直接检查和 3 项选择检查全部通过。作者的历史耗时保留为单次观察,本轮用不同的 Python 和 Node 版本复验了行为。远端 CI 未查询。

我的整体评价 / Verdict

同意合入这份台账更新。它给出了可以复查的归档终结边界,并保留重启前后的原验证及负例。性能表支持继续调查加载图,后续优化仍需守住暂停、独立任务和原始结算身份。

English verdict: APPROVE for 185980d58d27b9e5b6d5de3fd1af8c59fd7cc9c5. The documented recovery was reproduced on source and wheel with File and SQLite. Historical timing values remain diagnostic.

Signed-off-by: lusendong.6789 <lusendong.6789@bytedance.com>
Co-authored-by: TRAE CLI <traecli@bytedance.com>
@cocolord cocolord changed the title docs: record archived closeout recovery and guard cost diagnosis docs: qualify closeout recovery and select the next guard cost slice Nov 7, 2026

@loopx-agent loopx-agent left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer: model_agent | gpt-6.1-sol | OpenAI | runtime_reported | reasoning_effort=max

动机 / Motivation

这份记录帮助维护者判断归档恢复已经验证到哪一步,以及下一步该调查哪些 guard 请求。原来的大状态样本在扣账后无法完成归档任务的原轮次;已合入的修复允许它在受控重启后恢复同一已验收结果。新提交追加两项成本对照,说明延迟导入的收效很小,也说明两个已有候选能减少上下文传输,同时保留同一份结果和结算。本次只记录已有恢复路径与源码组合的边界,候选合并、分发和采用由各自流程验证。突发中断、模型宿主恢复和匹配条件下的完整成本仍待验证。

改动思路 / Approach

保留原双语台账和旧失败记录,先确认已有恢复路径,再将临时导入对照与组合传输实验分开。#8286 省去未启用的 Anti-Entropy 校验,#8290 让只返回状态的回读继续校验注册、槽位和预算,同时省去 governing source。仍有实质贡献的路径继续绑定其来源。接下来的调查沿现有 Todo 投影和 quota owner 找可复用的来源读,不把暂时组合改成新的实现。

具体改动 / Changes

按基线 RFC 的 Document map and maintenance contract 核对。只变更 Appendix A 的英文和中文镜像,原恢复和回放段落与上一提交一致,新增的两行参数表及降幅相符。#8264 的准确批准和合并记录已读回。原源码及隔离 wheel 对照仍适用,运行时和测试输入路径与上一提交相同。V4 的模型宿主中断恢复、R1 的分发验收和 V10 的匹配完整成本仍待验证。 基线 RFC · 归档修复评审

对 efce6cb9c 和 9537687be 分别取与主干的增量,在临时源码工作树组合。File 与 SQLite 各跑基线和组合,四组都用 101 个 Todo 和真实 CLI。每组在自有 Effect 进程退出后恢复了原证据、首次完成时间和四份回执,只验证、写回和扣账一次。前后替换证据被拒绝,原轮次再次执行也被跳过。 新增英文记录 · 中文记录

独立插桩的夹具与作者计时夹具不同。两种存储都从 82 次请求降到 80 次,模块均为 503。跟踪确认被省去的是未启用能力的注册和校验请求,保留的状态校验为 2,045 字节且未携带 governing source。组合后三个最大的参数来源仍是文档列出的 Todo 上下文、quota 规划和 Vision 等待投影。SQLite 的独立延迟导入对照保持 82 次请求,只少加载两个模块,支持将优先级放在共享请求。 组合候选 #8286 · 组合候选 #8290

对主干的风险 / Risks

组合源码的 91 项 Python 和 20 项 TypeScript 检查通过。状态校验仍拒绝未注册槽位和伪装成状态的可复用贡献。之前验证过的 Monitor 回放继续保留一次 poll、零扣账和暂停优先。提交的双语检查、三个提交的 DCO、公开边界扫描和 quick 预检均通过。初次预检缺少本地 TypeScript 依赖,按仓库要求安装后在相同检查范围内通过。托管 CI 未查询。

[P3] 建议在表旁写明旧剖析使用的缓存前缀、写入开关、预热和跟踪入口,并列出临时延迟的三个导入。此前的对照已确认 -B 仍可读到有效缓存。本轮独立延迟了三组依赖,少了两个模块,作者记录少一个。两组都没有减少请求,但需要具体配置才能复现原来的模块数。单次参数观测也不计入响应、重试、启动、服务 CPU 或总延迟。 字节码表

我的整体评价 / Verdict

同意这次双语台账更新。读者可以沿原 CLI 复查恢复边界,并看到缩减参数和减少加载各自的实际作用。下一步在已有投影里验证来源复用,继续守住暂停、权限、原始结算和完整读取。组合 wheel、宿主采用与完整成本仍需各自验证。

English verdict: APPROVE for 76cdf88f5ad26c3fbe4bc00749d5286abeef887d. Independent File and SQLite runs reproduced the transport reduction and preserved the original closeout. Timing, combined wheel and model-host qualification remain open.

@huangruiteng
huangruiteng merged commit 388ed5e into main Nov 7, 2026
26 checks passed
@huangruiteng
huangruiteng deleted the codex/small-kernel-wheel-qualification-20261107 branch November 7, 2026 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants