Remove unused code samples

[curquiza]

Removes unused code samples from .code-samples.meilisearch.yaml that are neither referenced in the docs nor in the local config:

• field_properties_guide_searchable_1
• index_settings_tutorial_api_get_setting_1
• rename_an_index_1
• search_parameter_guide_show_ranking_score_details_1

Flagged by the CI: https://github.com/meilisearch/documentation/actions/runs/24176332506/job/70558505454

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@curquiza has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 3 minutes and 22 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 16c2607b-0f75-4cf1-8d24-eff3e3f4d229

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd9d4e5 and b0c8e7e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .code-samples.meilisearch.yaml

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/remove-unused-code-samples

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (bd9d4e5) to head (b0c8e7e).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #693   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           10        10           
  Lines          809       809           
=========================================
  Hits           809       809           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.