Add supplier diligence and peptide operating blueprint - #162
Open
alexmwein wants to merge 98 commits into
Open
Conversation
Applied the outstanding patches from the six-agent visual sweep, then measured
and found they had regressed contrast from 42 failures back to 94. Diagnosed
rather than shipped: the 94 came from only three distinct elements repeated
across pages.
.span / .cart-row-unit 4.42:1 --text-3 cleared 4.5 on --surface but reached
only 4.42 on --bg and 4.22 on --surface-soft,
so muted text failed anywhere it sat on a
tinted panel. Now #646d79, which clears 4.5 on
all three surfaces.
.wordmark-category 2.99:1 uses --text-2, correct on white but rendered
inside the slate footer. Scoped there to
--on-dark-3.
Measured against the original baseline across 30 page/width combinations:
contrast failures 143 -> 0 (-143)
off-grid spacing decls 115 -> 52 (-63)
text colours 18 -> 14
type size/weight pairs 55 -> 50
tap targets <44px 117 -> 107
A layout guard across nine routes at 390 and 1440 reports no horizontal overflow
and no collapsed containers, so none of the 52 patches repeated the unscoped-CSS
mistake that had broken the mobile homepage.
Type pairs remain the largest outstanding item. The display scale is unified but
small text still spans 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13px across four weights.
Sizes 7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 23 and 27 were absorbed into neighbouring steps, and a clamp that bottomed out at 7px was flattened to 9px, below which nothing on this site should render. Weights collapsed to three: 400 body, 500 label, 650 emphasis. The measured inventory still reported 700 and 900 after the CSS pass despite no such declaration existing in the file; they were coming from the user-agent stylesheet, which renders strong, b and headings at bold. Those are now normalised to 650 so the page carries one emphasis weight rather than two competing bolds. type size/weight pairs 55 -> 25 weights in use 6 -> 3 (400, 500, 650) The layout guard caught a regression this introduced: on the cart page at 390 the price was pushed 22px past the viewport, because the row head is a two-column flex whose title column had no lower bound and whose price could not shrink. The head now wraps and the meta line breaks anywhere. Guard reports clean across nine routes at 390 and 1440. Contrast remains at zero.
…ed meanings The system defines --cobalt as interactive-and-status and --success as reported and verified. Both were being spent elsewhere, which is why neither carried signal. --cobalt was painting every section eyebrow, every product card category label and the trust strip's decorative dots. Four non-interactive uses per screen meant the accent no longer said "you can act here", and the real controls competed with labels for the same colour. Non-interactive labels move to muted text. The dark bands keep a warm eyebrow, which is brand material rather than accent. --success was on every IN STOCK badge. Inventory state is unrelated to analytical verification, so by the time the eye reached the testing panel green had already been spent on something else. Stock badges are now neutral sitewide, not only on product cards where an earlier patch had scoped it. Measured: contrast still 0, text colours 14 -> 13, guard clean across nine routes at 390 and 1440.
…o two Invoked the frontend-design skill, which classifies this as an existing system and directs Module C: match the established language, remove chrome that does no work, align before decorating. Then measured alignment rather than judging it. Checkout, at 1440: shell edge 60 eyebrow, h1, stepper 60 legend, hint, fields, labels, inputs, actions 85 <- 25px off the axis summary heading, rows, total 1045 <- 25px off its panel edge Every piece of form content sat off the axis its own page heading sat on, because the step card's 24px padding plus 1px border pushed it there. That card was chrome doing no work: it is the only object in its column, so a background and border separated it from nothing. Removing it puts legend, hints, labels, inputs and actions on the same 60px axis as the heading above them, with steps separated by rhythm instead. The summary keeps its panel, being a genuinely distinct object. Site-wide, a left-axis probe across 13 routes found FIVE different distances from the shell edge to a block of copy: 0 for section headings, 17 inside a product card, 25 inside a bundle card, 32 inside the newsletter band, 48 inside the dark testing band. Nothing shared an axis with anything else. That is what reads as unprofessional even when the typography is right. Now two insets and only two: panels at --s-6, cards at --s-5. Every remaining off-axis element measures either 85 or 92, consistently, rather than five arbitrary values. Guard clean across nine routes at both widths. Contrast still 0.
Ran the design-review skill's design-system extraction against the live site. It
reported three font families in use where there should be two: Inter, IBM Plex
Mono, and Times.
Times was resolving on the html element itself, because the font stack was
declared only on body. Head elements are not rendered so nothing visibly broke,
but any element escaping body inheritance would have rendered serif. Set on html.
Also ran the skill's AI-slop checklist against the rendered site. Findings, honestly:
purple or violet gradients none
icon-in-circle 3-column feature grid none, the guide cards are heading plus
summary plus link, editorial rather than
the SaaS template pattern
centered everything no, the ten centred rules are labels,
steppers, empty states and buttons, all
legitimately centred UI
uniform bubbly radius no, four radii in use across sm/md/lg/pill
decorative blobs, emoji none
colored left-border on cards three instances, all on callouts and
notices rather than a card grid, which is
standard editorial practice, so left alone
generic hero copy no
Heading scale measures 56 / 33 / 20 / 16 at ratios of roughly 1.7, 1.65 and 1.25.
Four checks that measure the rendered page rather than reading source. Each one
caught a defect that source-reading had already declared clean:
design-probe spacing, type, colour, contrast, tap targets and per-component
fingerprints across 30 page/width combinations. Found 55 type
size/weight pairs, 18 text colours, 143 contrast failures, and
h1 rendering at 61px on one page and 72px on another.
layout-guard horizontal overflow and collapsed containers on 9 routes at both
widths. Found the mobile homepage rendering with a 0px-wide copy
column and 126px of sideways scroll.
alignment distance from the shell edge to every block of copy. Found five
different content insets, so nothing shared an axis with anything.
functional add to cart, the sell gate under a DOM-bypass attempt, the full
five-step checkout, card-data leakage, and search.
The sell gate check is deliberately adversarial: it re-enables a disabled button
in the DOM and clicks it, because disabling a control is a courtesy and the gate
in addToCart is what actually prevents an unsellable line.
Current state: functional all green, contrast 0, layout guard clean.
The probe found 85 distinct controls under 44px at 390, most of them inline links rendering 18px tall in the footer and navigation, which is a miss-tap on a phone. Links now carry min-height 44 with inline-flex centring and a negative block margin so the visual rhythm of the footer columns is unchanged. The drawer cross-sell action and the quantity steppers get the same floor. Everything is inside a max-width 640 block, so desktop density is untouched. mobile targets under 44px 85 -> 48 The 48 that remain are mostly the wordmark, which is a logo rather than a control, and small inline glyph links inside body copy where a 44px box would break the line rhythm. Contrast stays at 0 and the layout guard is clean.
The last values off the spacing grid were not written by us. Paragraphs and lists inherit a 1em block margin from the user-agent stylesheet, which at a 15px base resolves to 15px and sits between --s-3 and --s-4. Anywhere a rule did not set margin explicitly, vertical rhythm silently fell off the scale. Normalised to --s-4, with first and last child margins collapsed so container padding governs the edges rather than doubling up. Button interiors were 14px and 6px, both off the scale, now --s-4 and --s-2. off-grid declarations, excluding 1-2px hairlines 50 -> 23 What remains is genuinely sub-grid: hairline compensations on bordered controls, and computed values like the trust strip's 60px gutter which is the shell inset rather than a spacing decision. Functional all green, contrast 0, layout guard clean.
Five agents each took one surface, measured it, and returned anchored patches. All 33 applied with zero rejections. The proof card was a 200px sticker on the photograph at 1440 and display:none at 390, so the one contrast this catalog is built on did not exist on a phone at all. It moves into the copy column and becomes a record: subject and lot, the method beside each measured value, and the unreported row inside the same table rather than in a footnote. Reported values hold in ink, the unreported row recedes. That is the grammar the dark testing band already used. The trust strip restated the nav and said "testing status on every item" for the third time in one viewport. It now carries facts a buyer checks: 10 compounds of which 8 sellable, lyophilized 5 to 20 mg, RP-HPLC and ESI-MS, lot named on every cart line. Product cards had inverted hierarchy, a 38px price beside a 228px button, four of them forming one continuous blue bar. Price now leads and carries its lot. Category tiles held a label and a stranded arrow with roughly 128px of void between them. They now list what is actually in each category. Set cards were 548px tall for four lines with 90px of white above the name, and all three shared one photograph so the rail read as a rendering fault. Restructured so the image is no longer dominant. The unavailable set now explains itself inline instead of showing a grey blob. The newsletter band is removed. It was the loudest surface on the page, spent on the lowest-value action, and there is no email programme behind it. The footer now names the operator, states that analytical work is done by an independent contract laboratory and that OVO Labs runs no release testing of its own, and commits to a response window. All four harnesses green: functional, layout guard, contrast 0, and no regression in type pairs, colours or grid.
Ran the qa skill properly rather than relying on the five-assertion smoke test. 26 routes, interaction flows, and edge cases. Results: 0 critical, 0 high. Two reported failures were my test being wrong, not the site. The empty-state check read only the first 200 characters of body text, which is the disclosure banner, so it missed "Your cart is empty." and "There is nothing to check out." further down. The unlabeled-control check ignored nested img alt text, and the cart row image link is named by alt="BPC-157". The third was real and worse than a bug. Every drawer verification in this session used the selector .cart-button, which has never existed in this codebase. The trigger has always been [data-cart-open]. Clicking a selector that matches nothing throws no error, so the checks reported success while exercising nothing. Tested with the correct selector, the drawer passes 9 for 9: opens, renders the line, shows shipping progress and cross-sell, correct checkout link, moves focus in, closes on Escape, quantity works, cross-sell add works. Three harnesses added: route-sweep, flows, drawer. flows.mjs now asserts the trigger exists before clicking and fails loudly if a selector disappears, so a rename cannot produce a silent pass again. Also verified: promo codes accept valid and reject invalid, decrementing quantity from one removes the line, the checkout draft survives a reload, the back button works, the testing lookup handles a no-match, and a missing page does not 200.
Two defects visible on the desktop cart drawer, both mine. .drawer-cross carried `margin: auto ...`. In a flex column an auto top margin absorbs all free space, so a one-line cart pushed the cross-sell to the bottom and opened a 308px void directly under the item. Removing it moved the void below the cross-sell rather than closing it, because a drawer footer is bottom-anchored by design and short content always leaves slack. Two changes close it properly: the suggestion count now scales with cart length, four suggestions for a one-line cart down to one for a full cart, and the tinted panel takes flex 1 so it absorbs whatever the footer leaves over. gap under the item 308px -> 24px void above the footer 320px -> 0px The quantity stepper was spilling its own border box. An earlier touch-target pass set min-width and min-height 32px on .mini-quantity button, but the container is a 28/28/28 grid at 29px tall, so the buttons were larger than their cells and overflowed: the outline read as broken and the container's bottom border showed through beneath the value. The ::after already supplies a 44px hit area, so the min-size was both redundant and destructive. Removed, and the mobile override is now scoped to .quantity-control only. Radius moved from a hardcoded 4px onto --r-sm. Verified: no button spills its box, drawer passes 9 for 9, layout guard clean.
Author
|
Added an isolated female-first OVO Labs palette pilot in commit Preview route: Palette mapping:
Verification: 1440x1000 and 390x844 renders, zero horizontal overflow, all images loaded, no console errors, and the inherited add-to-cart interaction increments the cart count. |
Author
|
Palette refinement from Alex’s visual feedback: replaced the brown-leaning clay action token with a cleaner berry coral ( |
…rances Conversion work for a category where the buyer's whole question is whether the material is real. Every claim is bound to data the catalog already holds, so nothing here contradicts the site's own records. On "3x tested": the records show one report per lot, not three, so that exact phrase would have argued with the analytical panel two scrolls down. The true equivalent is that each lot carries three checks, identity, content and purity, each with its own method. That is what the buy box now says. Buy box, six checkmarks, all lot-bound: Third-party verified, analysed by an independent US laboratory, never in-house Three checks on lot TZ-2410-B, identity, content and purity, reported 2026-06-11 99.4% purity by RP-HPLC area %, published with its method Cold chain available, insulated mailer standard, gel pack and logger at checkout Arrives wrong or damaged, we fix it, replacement or refund Free shipping over $500, flat $12 below that The purity figure and the lot are read from that entry's own TESTING record, so each product states its own number rather than a catalog-wide boast. Trust strip now carries the catalog-wide floor, "every lot 98% or higher", measured across all ten published lots where the minimum is 98.2%. Checkout gains an assurance row directly under the order total, the highest abandonment surface on the site: encrypted checkout, plain packaging, cold chain with a temperature logger, damaged or wrong replaced or refunded. The analytical panel gains a verified badge naming the independent US laboratory. Also fixed three list items left from the previous markup with no icon element. They fell into the 15px icon column of the new grid and rendered one word per line, which is how "Free standard shipping over $500" was displaying. Still refused: fabricated reviews, ratings, customer counts, countdown timers, invented certifications, GMP or FDA language, and any human-use claim. Verified: 26 routes 0 critical 0 high, contrast still 0 across 30 combos, functional all green, layout guard clean.
Two defects the owner found in a screenshot that every automated check passed. The drawer Checkout button had its label pinned to the top of the box. Measured: 46px tall, text 2px from the top and 28px from the bottom. Cause was display:block combined with a min-height from the touch-target pass. align-items does nothing on a block, so the label never centred. Now inline-grid with place-items centre, measured at 14px top and 16px bottom. Applied to every button that is sized by min-height, since the same defect was latent on all of them. The trust block was six full sentences at the decision point. That is a wall a buyer skips rather than reads, which suppresses conversion instead of helping it. Same facts, now six badges scannable in about a second: 99.4% purity · Third-party tested · US lab verified Cold chain ready · Free over $500 · Damage covered The purity figure is still read from that entry's own lot record, so each product states its own number. The layout guard then caught a regression I had just introduced: the unsellable product variant still carried sentence-length copy, which inherited the badge rule's white-space nowrap and overflowed the retatrutide page by 129px at 390. That variant is now badges too. Verified: layout guard clean at both widths, functional all green, drawer 9 for 9, contrast still 0 across 30 combos.
The marks were six full sentences sitting below the spec tiles. Two problems:
length, since nobody reads six lines of prose at a decision point, and position,
since they were nowhere near the button the buyer is looking at.
Now four marks on one line, directly under Add to cart:
99.4% purity · Third-party tested · Cold chain ready · Free over $500
Styling is deliberately quiet. A check in verified green against muted text, no
filled pill. A row of saturated badges reads as marketing, and this catalog's
whole argument is that it is not making marketing claims. The purity figure is
still read from that entry's own lot record, so each product states its own
number rather than a catalog-wide boast.
The same treatment now runs across the funnel:
catalog card leads its testing line with the purity figure
product page four marks under the CTA
checkout Encrypted · Plain packaging · Cold chain · Damage covered,
one line under the order total instead of four stacked sentences
The unavailable variant gets three marks rather than four, dropping the shipping
line that cannot apply.
Verified: layout guard clean at both widths, 26 routes 0 critical 0 high,
functional all green, contrast still 0 across 30 combos.
…leaked comment
Six inspectors, 1,703 tool calls. Five returned before the process exited,
reporting 52 measured findings, 18 of them high. Twenty-one patches applied plus
three fixed by hand.
Three defects were shipping and visible:
A JSX-style comment, {/* ... */}, was written inside a plain JS template literal
on the cart page. Template literals do not have comments, so the entire block was
rendering as literal text between the cart rows and the actions.
The discount Apply button on the checkout page had no handler at all.
bindPromoForm returned early unless PAGE was "cart", and then bound only the
first matching form on the document. Two promo forms exist, one on the cart and
one in the checkout summary, so the checkout button looked interactive and did
nothing. That is the exact class of control this project forbids.
The PDP quantity buttons were spilling their own grid cells. .quantity-control is
a 34px/1fr/34px grid, and my own mobile touch-target rule sized its buttons to
44px. This is the third time this defect has appeared and the second time I
caused it: I had scoped the earlier fix TO .quantity-control, which is precisely
where it breaks. Hit area comes from the ::after, which is already 44px.
Also corrected from the team's report: the Phone field labelled optional while
carrying a required attribute, stepper pills rendered as disabled buttons, the
blocked checkout CTA dimming its whole subtree with opacity, the cart count badge
hide logic, and trailing arrows breaking under an inline-grid button rule.
Two harnesses added, and one of my own tests was wrong: flows.mjs read only the
first 200 characters of body text when checking empty states, which is the
disclosure banner, so it reported two false failures. box-containment.mjs is new
and checks the defect class my other harnesses were blind to, a child sized
larger than its parent's border box.
Verified: 26 routes 0 critical 0 high, layout guard clean, functional green,
drawer 9 for 9, flows 10 for 10, contrast still 0 across 30 combos.
The retatrutide storefront census (84-112 confirmed US storefronts) and the social/affiliate recon were the only competitor research still living exclusively in the gitignored .context directory. Everything else from the 2026-07-27 sweep -- catalogs, checkout matrix, processor census, traffic/revenue model -- was already archived here. These two complete the set so the brand intelligence survives this machine. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Quantifies what the storefront census did not: buyer-pool size, search trajectory, community growth, and the buy-intent SERP landscape. Key findings: the reta-specific buyer pool triangulates to the low-to-mid hundreds of thousands, not millions; search interest crossed above semaglutide but is down 25-30% off the May 2026 TRIUMPH-1 spike with no catalyst until Lilly files in Q1 2027; vendor supply is growing faster than demand (Finnrick 179 -> 239 in two months); and Google ranks month-old vendor domains at #1 on transactional queries, so SEO entry is weeks not years -- while Bing sells the ads Google refuses, with only about three vendors bidding. Sources and confidence levels are recorded per dimension. Absolute search-volume figures published for this term disagree by two orders of magnitude and are flagged as unreliable. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Key operating decision
One accountable supply-chain owner, multiple qualified specialists. The laboratory supplies data, the 3PL supplies custody, and independent Quality alone releases inventory. Direct-to-consumer unapproved retatrutide is a no-go; the durable paths are institution-only research or a separately governed licensed-care business using lawful therapies.
Verification
npm run buildhtml-validateon the new operating pagenode --checkon the section-navigation scriptVERDICT: PASSScope and publishing note
5da55ea6alexmweinwith HTTP 403; this open cross-fork PR uses the repository’s existing writable fork