Skip to content

chore(repo): allow the snmp-telemetry scope in PR titles - #565

Merged
leoparente merged 1 commit into
developfrom
ci/allow-snmp-telemetry-scope
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore(repo): allow the snmp-telemetry scope in PR titles#565
leoparente merged 1 commit into
developfrom
ci/allow-snmp-telemetry-scope

Conversation

@leoparente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

One line, so that #564 can pass its own title check.

pr-title-lint runs on pull_request_target, which means GitHub evaluates the workflow
definition from the base branch rather than from the PR branch. #564 adds
snmp-telemetry to the scope allowlist, but the check that runs against it reads
develop's copy, which does not have the scope yet. So #564 fails its own title check no
matter what it contains.

Landing the scope on develop first breaks that circularity. #564 keeps the matching
CONTRIBUTING.md documentation and the agent.releaserc.json no-release rule for the
same scope, so this PR is deliberately just the one line.

This PR's own title uses repo, which is already allowlisted.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

pr-title-lint runs on pull_request_target, so GitHub evaluates the workflow
from the base branch. A PR that adds a scope to the allowlist is still checked
against develop's copy and fails its own title check. Landing the scope on
develop first lets #564 pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Vulnerability Scan: Passed

Image: orb-agent:scan

Source Library CVE Severity Installed Fixed Title
Python setuptools CVE-2026-59890 🟡 MEDIUM 70.3.0 83.0.0 setuptools: setuptools: MANIFEST.in exclusion bypass in sdist via Unicode normal

Commit: 409e1f1

@leoparente
leoparente merged commit 89a4b63 into develop Aug 31, 2026
7 checks passed
@leoparente
leoparente deleted the ci/allow-snmp-telemetry-scope branch August 31, 2026 12:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants