First step for integration with more complex fields#6
Open
vlad-ghita wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
Author
|
Latest commit requires an extra attribute to be passed to The |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, Nick.
I adjusted the templates to accept more generic handles. This means that postback values can be persisted even for more complex fields (
Date/ Time,Multilingual *).Classic handle
=>
handle="fields[name]"Improved handle
=>
handle="fields[name][value-ro]"handle now accepts a sort of xPath:
parent-node/node/....There is a special use-case for
Date/Timefield. It needs something likefields[date][start][]to work. In order to generate it, use like this:=>
handle="fields[date][start][]"Notice the extra space
afterdata/start/. It's the only soultion I could think of.At these lines I don't know what's going on so I didn't update them (I don't have a test environment for it). You should have a look and adapt them . The
form:postback-find-valuemight be useful.Regards,
Vlad