Define tetra residual transition proof terms - #4
Closed
numpde wants to merge 3 commits into
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This draft implements a narrow substrate slice toward exact residual-transition replay.
It adds a typed
WriterResidualTransitionTermfor tetra token and local-order restrictions. Verification replays the typed restriction from the source residual snapshot, checks exact propagation work evidence, applies declared factor discharge, and requires the exact successor snapshot. Focused negative tests cover a coherent wrong token restriction, omitted factor discharge, and forged work metrics.Intentionally not included yet:
Created through the GitHub connector; draft status is used to obtain CI before any consideration of merging.