require iat in PoP #134
Merged
require iat in PoP #134
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
c2bo
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2025
Member
c2bo
left a comment
c2bo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, especially with the removal of exp, mandating iat seems like a good idea.
Co-authored-by: Christian Bormann <[email protected]>
paulbastian
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2025
tplooker
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The draft has a lot to say about utilizing
iatandjtifor replay detection, to that end theiatmust be present.closes #133