Skip to content

Fix link to AI Policy in CONTRIBUTING.md - #7576

Merged
nateprewitt merged 2 commits into
psf:mainfrom
yamac-kurtulus:fix-link-to-ai-policy
Jul 9, 2026
Merged

Fix link to AI Policy in CONTRIBUTING.md#7576
nateprewitt merged 2 commits into
psf:mainfrom
yamac-kurtulus:fix-link-to-ai-policy

Conversation

@yamac-kurtulus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The AI Policy is not accessible with a relative link inside .github folder, this PR fixes it.

Comment thread .github/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated
Before opening any issues or proposing any pull requests, please read
our [Contributor's Guide](https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dev/contributing/)
as well as our [AI Policy](./AI_POLICY.md).
as well as our [AI Policy](./.github/AI_POLICY.md).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We may need a fully qualified link here. The reason it's broken is because it's rendered at two different points.

It's correct if you're viewing CONTRIBUTING.md directly, but broken for when you click the link for Contributing on the repo.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah well I just checked it if it works on the tab, not by viewing the file on repo. Good catch.

Comment thread .github/CONTRIBUTING.md
Before opening any issues or proposing any pull requests, please read
our [Contributor's Guide](https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dev/contributing/)
as well as our [AI Policy](./.github/AI_POLICY.md).
as well as our [AI Policy](/.github/AI_POLICY.md).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested on my repo, works both from the tab, and the file itself, turns out absolute path from root is sufficient, not a full path.

@nateprewitt nateprewitt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright, I think this'll work. Thanks, @yamac-kurtulus!

@nateprewitt
nateprewitt merged commit d38495c into psf:main Jul 9, 2026
33 checks passed
luisfelp07 added a commit to marianocho/hack2l that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2026
Medido em 10 PRs de Flask, Django, httpx, Gin, Next.js e Requests.

  acusacoes com arbitro preenchido   94
  arbitro do vocabulario do Hack2L   93  (99%)
  o 94o                              'R1 R2 R3 R4 AC1 AC2 AC3 AC4 AC5'
                                     -- a lista inteira do prompt, colada

Fora do desafio a taxa real de arbitro e' ZERO. Os 45% que eu tinha
comemorado como 'acima do piso' mediam contaminacao, nao cobertura.

Explica tambem por que a lente de prd nunca ficou vazia em 10 PRs: ela
sempre tem criterio para conferir porque os criterios estao dentro dela.
Nao lia o repositorio, recitava o desafio.

CONTROLE NEGATIVO (psf/requests#7576, um link de markdown, 11 acusacoes
ao advogado com read_file e grep):

  REFUTADO 7 (64%) · INCONCLUSIVO 2 (18%) · PROVADO 2 (18%)
  US$ 0,61 e 328s para limpar um PR de documentacao

Sete refutados e' a boa noticia: a divisao promotor/advogado funciona.
Os dois sobreviventes tem causas diferentes:

  1. erro de raciocinio com a direcao invertida -- alegou que caminho
     absoluto em markdown vira URL de dominio (falso; o GitHub resolve da
     raiz do repo) e acusou o CONSERTO de ser o defeito
  2. o PRD do Hack2L aplicado ao psf/requests: 'nenhum requisito R1-R4 ou
     AC1-AC5 pode ser validado por esta mudanca'. O advogado provou uma
     verdade trivial sobre criterios de outro projeto.

CONSERTO: arbitro vira citacao com procedencia do repo sob revisao
({regra, onde}), nao lista fixa. Sem fonte, null -- que e' a resposta
honesta. Consequencia seria: com null honesto a R1 rebaixa quase tudo
para SUSPEITA, e o produto passa a precisar de uma segunda via para
severidade alta que nao dependa de arbitro.

Tambem consertado neste commit: o relatorio somava INCONCLUSIVO com
REFUTADO e dizia 'refutou tudo' quando nenhuma ferramenta tinha
funcionado. Absolvicao falsa no proprio medidor.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants