Conversation
doc: add seealso link to src-layout vs flat-layout discussion (cherry picked from commit 3c37b55)
webknjaz
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a backport of PR #14184 as merged into main (3c37b55).
Split from #14181 per @webknjaz's review — keeping changes atomic.
Changes
Add a
.. seealso::cross-reference ingoodpractices.rstto the packaging.python.org discussion on src layout vs flat layout.Reworked from the original PR to use intersphinx (via the existing
packagingmapping) instead of a raw URL, per @webknjaz's feedback.Open question from the previous review: whether a standalone
.. seealso::block is the right approach, or whether linking the existing text inline would be better. Happy to rework if there's a preference.