Skip to content

[PR #14184/3c37b551 backport][9.0.x] doc: add seealso link to src-layout vs flat-layout discussion#14188

Merged
webknjaz merged 1 commit into9.0.xfrom
patchback/backports/9.0.x/3c37b551e71c8b18c5323dac8a27d248bb98a5a9/pr-14184
Feb 12, 2026
Merged

[PR #14184/3c37b551 backport][9.0.x] doc: add seealso link to src-layout vs flat-layout discussion#14188
webknjaz merged 1 commit into9.0.xfrom
patchback/backports/9.0.x/3c37b551e71c8b18c5323dac8a27d248bb98a5a9/pr-14184

Conversation

@patchback
Copy link

@patchback patchback bot commented Feb 12, 2026

This is a backport of PR #14184 as merged into main (3c37b55).

Split from #14181 per @webknjaz's review — keeping changes atomic.

Changes

Add a .. seealso:: cross-reference in goodpractices.rst to the packaging.python.org discussion on src layout vs flat layout.

Reworked from the original PR to use intersphinx (via the existing packaging mapping) instead of a raw URL, per @webknjaz's feedback.

Open question from the previous review: whether a standalone .. seealso:: block is the right approach, or whether linking the existing text inline would be better. Happy to rework if there's a preference.

doc: add seealso link to src-layout vs flat-layout discussion
(cherry picked from commit 3c37b55)
@webknjaz webknjaz merged commit cf85b50 into 9.0.x Feb 12, 2026
33 checks passed
@webknjaz webknjaz deleted the patchback/backports/9.0.x/3c37b551e71c8b18c5323dac8a27d248bb98a5a9/pr-14184 branch February 12, 2026 23:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant