Skip to content

ci: support CI on wrynose#37

Open
Ricardo Salveti (ricardosalveti) wants to merge 5 commits into
qualcomm-linux:wrynosefrom
ricardosalveti:wrynose-ci
Open

ci: support CI on wrynose#37
Ricardo Salveti (ricardosalveti) wants to merge 5 commits into
qualcomm-linux:wrynosefrom
ricardosalveti:wrynose-ci

Conversation

@ricardosalveti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Current CI settings are specific to main, separate workflows so they can be branch based and add support for specific wrynose-based workflows.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. To prevent automatic closure in 5 days, remove the stale label or add a comment. You can reopen a closed pull request at any time.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. To prevent automatic closure in 5 days, remove the stale label or add a comment. You can reopen a closed pull request at any time.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Stale label Jul 6, 2026
@koenkooi

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Is this one still relevant?

@ricardosalveti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Is this one still relevant?

Yup, was waiting to clear out the CI first (which is done now), will work on this one again.

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the Stale label Jul 7, 2026
Update the meta-qcom repo pin in the kas fragments to track the wrynose
LTS branch. All other upstream layer branches (openembedded-core,
bitbake, meta-openembedded, etc.) and the base.lock.yml pins are
inherited from meta-qcom's own ci fragments through the kas includes,
so no other change is needed on this side.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@oss.qualcomm.com>
For push and pull_request events, GitHub runs the workflow file from the
pushed branch (push) or the PR's base branch (pull_request). The wrynose
copies of these workflows therefore only ever evaluate for wrynose, so
listing main in their branch filters is unreachable dead config.

Point the push, pr, qcom-preflight-checks, and markdownlint branch
filters at wrynose only. The main branch carries its own copies listing
only main.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@oss.qualcomm.com>
GitHub Actions only runs schedule-triggered workflows from the
repository's default branch (main), so this copy never executes from
wrynose. Main already carries the copy that actually runs; keeping an
inert duplicate here only creates drift and confusion.

Remove it so wrynose carries only the workflows that run from it.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@oss.qualcomm.com>
Document the wrynose LTS branch in the Branches section: it tracks the
Yocto Project 6.0 LTS release and is used by Qualcomm Linux 2.x.

Update the layer dependencies to point at the wrynose branches of
openembedded-core and meta-qcom, matching what the CI builds against.

The "Build on push" and "Nightly Build" badges defaulted to the
repository default branch (main). On the wrynose branch they should
reflect wrynose CI status instead, so add branch=wrynose to the
shields.io image URLs and query=branch:wrynose to the workflow links.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@oss.qualcomm.com>
wrynose is the LTS Stable branch, where backporting from main is the
default contribution path, mirroring the workflow established in
meta-qcom.

Add BACKPORTING.md as the source of truth for the backport workflow:
the git cherry-pick -x path from main, the exception for wrynose-only
changes, the CI-equivalent checks to run before opening a PR, and the
[Backport wrynose] commit message conventions.

Adapt AGENTS.md with the LTS callout and rework the contribution
section to point at BACKPORTING.md, adapt the docs/contributing.md
introduction and upstream target branch accordingly, and reference the
backport workflow from the README Contributing section.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@oss.qualcomm.com>
@lumag

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Nicolas Dechesne (@ndechesne) , could you please take a look?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants