Skip to content

qrb2210-unoq: update partitions based on the edk2-downstream boot fir…#103

Merged
Nicolas Dechesne (ndechesne) merged 1 commit into
qualcomm-linux:mainfrom
ricardosalveti:unoq
Apr 22, 2026
Merged

qrb2210-unoq: update partitions based on the edk2-downstream boot fir…#103
Nicolas Dechesne (ndechesne) merged 1 commit into
qualcomm-linux:mainfrom
ricardosalveti:unoq

Conversation

@ricardosalveti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…mware

Update filenames based on the new edk2-downstream boot firmware release available at [1], and remove partitions which are not used / required anymore.

Removing should not cause any impact on current users, as they will simply not be used anymore.

[1]
https://softwarecenter.qualcomm.com/nexus/generic/product/chip/tech-package/QRB2210_bootbinaries.1.0/qrb2210_bootbinaries.1.0-test-device-public/00010/Agatti_bootbinaries.zip

…mware

Update filenames based on the new edk2-downstream boot firmware release
available at [1], and remove partitions which are not used / required
anymore.

Removing should not cause any impact on current users, as they will
simply not be used anymore.

[1]
https://softwarecenter.qualcomm.com/nexus/generic/product/chip/tech-package/QRB2210_bootbinaries.1.0/qrb2210_bootbinaries.1.0-test-device-public/00010/Agatti_bootbinaries.zip

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo.salveti@oss.qualcomm.com>
@ricardosalveti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Created as draft as it is still pending validation.

@lool

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks! Should we consider tweaking partition sizes to align with other QLI platforms and have comparable budgets for newly flashed devices? The Arduino version of the file might be constrained in keeping the location of the userdata partition.

This might be a good opportunity to add the other two hardware partitions, with blank filenames for MAC addresses:
#67
(added support here #66)

@ricardosalveti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks! Should we consider tweaking partition sizes to align with other QLI platforms and have comparable budgets for newly flashed devices? The Arduino version of the file might be constrained in keeping the location of the userdata partition.

This might be a good opportunity to add the other two hardware partitions, with blank filenames for MAC addresses: #67 (added support here #66)

That will imply a significant difference in the partition table, which is not nice for users coming from an older release, but I guess we have a bit more freedom with the non-arduino partition file.

@ricardosalveti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I would prefer separating the partition reduction and major changes from this PR, as then we can trace regressions and issues easily, since it will be a major and breaking change.

@ricardosalveti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Validated with qualcomm-linux/meta-qcom-3rdparty#28.

@b49020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ricardo Salveti (@ricardosalveti) are you also planning to update for RB1 here: https://github.com/qualcomm-linux/qcom-ptool/blob/main/platforms/qrb2210-rb1/emmc/partitions.conf?

Comment thread platforms/qrb2210-unoq/emmc-16GB-arduino/partitions.conf
Comment thread platforms/qrb2210-unoq/emmc-16GB-arduino/partitions.conf
@ricardosalveti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ricardo Salveti (@ricardosalveti) are you also planning to update for RB1 here: https://github.com/qualcomm-linux/qcom-ptool/blob/main/platforms/qrb2210-rb1/emmc/partitions.conf?

Yes, checking this one today.

@b49020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ricardo Salveti (@ricardosalveti) Dmitry Baryshkov (@lumag) is there anything pending for this PR to be merged?

@p-badge

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Any update on this PR why this is still pending?

@lumag

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Any update on this PR why this is still pending?

Because the answer regarding km4 was received just 4 hours ago.

@ndechesne Nicolas Dechesne (ndechesne) merged commit 9603b33 into qualcomm-linux:main Apr 22, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants