Skip to content

Conversation

@PayManiRazor
Copy link
Contributor

  • Update client.py to use 'mode' instead of 'device_mode' for consistency
  • Update device_activity.py to pass 'mode' parameter consistently
  • All APIs (Device Activity and Order) now use unified 'mode' parameter
  • Eliminates confusion between 'mode' and 'device_mode' parameters
  • Maintains backward compatibility through **kwargs pattern

Note :- Please follow the below points while attaching test cases document link below:

- If label Tested is added then test cases document URL is mandatory.

- Link added should be a valid URL and accessible throughout the org.

- If the branch name contains hotfix / revert by default the BVT workflow check will pass.

Test Case Document URL
Please paste test case document link here....

- Update client.py to use 'mode' instead of 'device_mode' for consistency
- Update device_activity.py to pass 'mode' parameter consistently
- All APIs (Device Activity and Order) now use unified 'mode' parameter
- Eliminates confusion between 'mode' and 'device_mode' parameters
- Maintains backward compatibility through **kwargs pattern
@PayManiRazor PayManiRazor requested a review from sunnyagg August 28, 2025 06:16
- Update client.py to use device_mode instead of mode parameter
- Update device_activity.py method signatures to use device_mode
- Update tests to use device_mode consistently
- Ensure consistent parameter naming across Device Activity and Order APIs
- Change parameter name from 'mode' to 'device_mode' in _validate_device_mode method
- Update docstring and all references for consistency
- Ensure complete device_mode parameter standardization
@PayManiRazor PayManiRazor added the TestingNotRequired TestingNotRequired label for BVT label Aug 28, 2025
@PayManiRazor PayManiRazor merged commit be0c6a9 into master Aug 28, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

TestingNotRequired TestingNotRequired label for BVT

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants