formattedref admits footnotes in the standoc context - #66
Merged
Conversation
andrew2net
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refs metanorma/metanorma-model-iso#154
Authored footnotes inside free-form
formattedrefbibliography entries are attested in the samples fleet (IEEE documents) and render correctly; the grammar excludedfn. This adds aformattedrefoverride to biblio-standoc.rnc's existinginclude "biblio.rnc"block — biblio.rnc itself is untouched, so the plain-relaton model keepsTextElement+; the footnote admission applies to the standoc context only. (The #154 ticket originally placed this override in isodoc.rnc; isodoc.rnc includes no biblio grammar, so the include-override here is the single site that flows into every flavor — mechanics noted on the ticket.)🤖