Skip to content

Mention DEPRECATED_LLVM_INTRINSIC lint for internal use#155805

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
shian15810:patch-1
Apr 26, 2026
Merged

Mention DEPRECATED_LLVM_INTRINSIC lint for internal use#155805
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
shian15810:patch-1

Conversation

@shian15810
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since link_llvm_intrinsics is an internal feature, having deprecated_llvm_intrinsic lint appearing in https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/lints/listing/allowed-by-default.html#deprecated-llvm-intrinsic without mentioning its internal nature is quite confusing to the end users.

This PR improves the documentation of recently merged PR #140763 that implemented deprecated_llvm_intrinsic lint by mentioning the internal nature of deprecated_llvm_intrinsic lint and link_llvm_intrinsics feature.

Tracking issue of unstable link_llvm_intrinsics feature: #29602

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 26, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 26, 2026

r? @jdonszelmann

rustbot has assigned @jdonszelmann.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler
  • compiler expanded to 73 candidates
  • Random selection from 20 candidates

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mejrs mejrs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r? me

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

View changes since this review

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Apr 26, 2026

📌 Commit efaf460 has been approved by mejrs

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 26, 2026
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 26, 2026
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2026
Mention `DEPRECATED_LLVM_INTRINSIC` lint for internal use

Since `link_llvm_intrinsics` is an internal feature, having `deprecated_llvm_intrinsic` lint appearing in https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/lints/listing/allowed-by-default.html#deprecated-llvm-intrinsic without mentioning its internal nature is quite confusing to the end users.

This PR improves the documentation of recently merged PR rust-lang#140763 that implemented `deprecated_llvm_intrinsic` lint by mentioning the internal nature of `deprecated_llvm_intrinsic` lint and `link_llvm_intrinsics` feature.

Tracking issue of unstable `link_llvm_intrinsics` feature: rust-lang#29602
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2026
Mention `DEPRECATED_LLVM_INTRINSIC` lint for internal use

Since `link_llvm_intrinsics` is an internal feature, having `deprecated_llvm_intrinsic` lint appearing in https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/lints/listing/allowed-by-default.html#deprecated-llvm-intrinsic without mentioning its internal nature is quite confusing to the end users.

This PR improves the documentation of recently merged PR rust-lang#140763 that implemented `deprecated_llvm_intrinsic` lint by mentioning the internal nature of `deprecated_llvm_intrinsic` lint and `link_llvm_intrinsics` feature.

Tracking issue of unstable `link_llvm_intrinsics` feature: rust-lang#29602
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2026
…uwer

Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #152995 (ACP Implementation of PermissionsExt for Windows )
 - #153457 (prevent deref coercions in `pin!`)
 - #155250 (Windows: Cache the pipe filesystem handle)
 - #155574 (Move `std::io::RawOsError` to `core::io`)
 - #155757 (macro_metavar_expr_concat: explain why idents are invalid)
 - #155823 (miri subtree update)
 - #155693 (Suggest enclosing format string with `""` under special cases)
 - #155707 (Fix minor panic-unsoundness in CString::clone_into)
 - #155719 (Suggest `.iter()` for shared projections)
 - #155779 (ssa_range_prop: use `if let` guards)
 - #155789 (Cleanups to `AttributeExt`)
 - #155805 (Mention `DEPRECATED_LLVM_INTRINSIC` lint for internal use)
 - #155806 (Remove the incomplete marker from `impl` restrictions)
 - #155820 (Avoid improper spans when `...` or `..=` is recovered from non-ASCII)
 - #155822 (Add default field values to diagnostic FormatArgs)
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot merged commit c96f7d2 into rust-lang:main Apr 26, 2026
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.97.0 milestone Apr 26, 2026
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2026
Rollup merge of #155805 - shian15810:patch-1, r=mejrs

Mention `DEPRECATED_LLVM_INTRINSIC` lint for internal use

Since `link_llvm_intrinsics` is an internal feature, having `deprecated_llvm_intrinsic` lint appearing in https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/lints/listing/allowed-by-default.html#deprecated-llvm-intrinsic without mentioning its internal nature is quite confusing to the end users.

This PR improves the documentation of recently merged PR #140763 that implemented `deprecated_llvm_intrinsic` lint by mentioning the internal nature of `deprecated_llvm_intrinsic` lint and `link_llvm_intrinsics` feature.

Tracking issue of unstable `link_llvm_intrinsics` feature: #29602
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants