Flatbuild test#39
Closed
sgaud-quic wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
Add github workflow snapshot Signed-off-by: Salendarsingh Gaud <sgaud@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Salendarsingh Gaud <sgaud@qti.qualcomm.com>
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
7 times, most recently
from
da1c3c4 to
ac1165d
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
3 times, most recently
from
e7f210e to
bfb2278
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
3 times, most recently
from
013318e to
8a0c2d2
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
3 times, most recently
from
e40bef9 to
cdcb174
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
2 times, most recently
from
343c578 to
2fce54c
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
7 times, most recently
from
05076a9 to
413f4e8
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
3 times, most recently
from
a262b27 to
e4ac924
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
3 times, most recently
from
1463b11 to
00191fd
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7d16088 to
76eeb9b
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
7 times, most recently
from
c61666b to
0dc42e4
Compare
sgaud-quic
force-pushed
the
qcom-next-staging
branch
3 times, most recently
from
2502777 to
77c0c92
Compare
sgaud-quic
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2026
… to macb_open() In the non-RT kernel, local_bh_disable() merely disables preemption, whereas it maps to an actual spin lock in the RT kernel. Consequently, when attempting to refill RX buffers via netdev_alloc_skb() in macb_mac_link_up(), a deadlock scenario arises as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.18.0-08691-g2061f18ad76e #39 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:0/8 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00080369bbe0 (&bp->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: macb_start_xmit+0x808/0xb7c but task is already holding lock: ffff000803698e58 (&queue->tx_ptr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: macb_start_xmit +0x148/0xb7c which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&queue->tx_ptr_lock){+...}-{3:3}: rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 macb_start_xmit+0x148/0xb7c dev_hard_start_xmit+0x94/0x284 sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #2 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+...}-{3:3}: rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 sch_direct_xmit+0x11c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #1 ((softirq_ctrl.lock)){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_release+0x250/0x348 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x7c/0x240 __netdev_alloc_skb+0x1b4/0x1d8 gem_rx_refill+0xdc/0x240 gem_init_rings+0xb4/0x108 macb_mac_link_up+0x9c/0x2b4 phylink_resolve+0x170/0x614 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #0 (&bp->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x15a8/0x2084 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x350 rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 macb_start_xmit+0x808/0xb7c dev_hard_start_xmit+0x94/0x284 sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &bp->lock --> _xmit_ETHER#2 --> &queue->tx_ptr_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&queue->tx_ptr_lock); lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); lock(&queue->tx_ptr_lock); lock(&bp->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** Call trace: show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C) dump_stack_lvl+0xa0/0xf0 dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_circular_bug+0x28c/0x370 check_noncircular+0x198/0x1ac __lock_acquire+0x15a8/0x2084 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x350 rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 macb_start_xmit+0x808/0xb7c dev_hard_start_xmit+0x94/0x284 sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Notably, invoking the mog_init_rings() callback upon link establishment is unnecessary. Instead, we can exclusively call mog_init_rings() within the ndo_open() callback. This adjustment resolves the deadlock issue. Furthermore, since MACB_CAPS_MACB_IS_EMAC cases do not use mog_init_rings() when opening the network interface via at91ether_open(), moving mog_init_rings() to macb_open() also eliminates the MACB_CAPS_MACB_IS_EMAC check. Fixes: 633e98a ("net: macb: use resolved link config in mac_link_up()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Kevin Hao <kexin.hao@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222015624.1994551-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
sgaud-quic
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2026
… to macb_open() commit 99537d5 upstream. In the non-RT kernel, local_bh_disable() merely disables preemption, whereas it maps to an actual spin lock in the RT kernel. Consequently, when attempting to refill RX buffers via netdev_alloc_skb() in macb_mac_link_up(), a deadlock scenario arises as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.18.0-08691-g2061f18ad76e #39 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:0/8 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00080369bbe0 (&bp->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: macb_start_xmit+0x808/0xb7c but task is already holding lock: ffff000803698e58 (&queue->tx_ptr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: macb_start_xmit +0x148/0xb7c which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&queue->tx_ptr_lock){+...}-{3:3}: rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 macb_start_xmit+0x148/0xb7c dev_hard_start_xmit+0x94/0x284 sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #2 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+...}-{3:3}: rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 sch_direct_xmit+0x11c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #1 ((softirq_ctrl.lock)){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_release+0x250/0x348 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x7c/0x240 __netdev_alloc_skb+0x1b4/0x1d8 gem_rx_refill+0xdc/0x240 gem_init_rings+0xb4/0x108 macb_mac_link_up+0x9c/0x2b4 phylink_resolve+0x170/0x614 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #0 (&bp->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x15a8/0x2084 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x350 rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 macb_start_xmit+0x808/0xb7c dev_hard_start_xmit+0x94/0x284 sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &bp->lock --> _xmit_ETHER#2 --> &queue->tx_ptr_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&queue->tx_ptr_lock); lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); lock(&queue->tx_ptr_lock); lock(&bp->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** Call trace: show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C) dump_stack_lvl+0xa0/0xf0 dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_circular_bug+0x28c/0x370 check_noncircular+0x198/0x1ac __lock_acquire+0x15a8/0x2084 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x350 rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 macb_start_xmit+0x808/0xb7c dev_hard_start_xmit+0x94/0x284 sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Notably, invoking the mog_init_rings() callback upon link establishment is unnecessary. Instead, we can exclusively call mog_init_rings() within the ndo_open() callback. This adjustment resolves the deadlock issue. Furthermore, since MACB_CAPS_MACB_IS_EMAC cases do not use mog_init_rings() when opening the network interface via at91ether_open(), moving mog_init_rings() to macb_open() also eliminates the MACB_CAPS_MACB_IS_EMAC check. Fixes: 633e98a ("net: macb: use resolved link config in mac_link_up()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Kevin Hao <kexin.hao@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222015624.1994551-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.