Audit and benchmark non-file hot paths - #3
Open
siraben wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
Follow-up hot-path pass pushed through Implemented and kept:
Current focused RV64/i386 comparison after the changes:
Discarded after measurement:
Validation run before pushing:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Benchmark Notes
Final focused run:
Earlier focused before/after for the poll change showed RV64 epoll_eventfd moving from 0.207266s to 0.136769s, a 1.515x speedup on that immediate-ready workload. The final broader run still shows epoll_eventfd at 1.503x vs i386.
Validation
ninja -C build-bench-rv64 ishpython3 -m py_compile benchmarks/hot_paths/compare.py benchmarks/hot_paths/run.pygit diff --check