Skip to content

chore: move the aptos smoke workflow off aptos-init#417

Draft
cawthorne wants to merge 6 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/aptos-off-aptos-init
Draft

chore: move the aptos smoke workflow off aptos-init#417
cawthorne wants to merge 6 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/aptos-off-aptos-init

Conversation

@cawthorne
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@cawthorne cawthorne commented Apr 2, 2026

Summary

  • move the Aptos smoke workflow off the old aptos-init core branch
  • temporarily point the smoke workflow at the paired chainlink PR branch until smartcontractkit/chainlink#21828 merges
  • explicitly opt the generated core TOML into mock-streams-trigger@1.0.0 so the existing workflow smoke path still works with gated core registration
  • make the PR-body override accept the documented core_ref:<ref>; syntax
  • remove the stale README note that said develop could not work yet

Depends on

  • smartcontractkit/chainlink#21828

Follow-up after merge

  • switch .github/workflows/aptos-run-smoke-tests.yml from feature/aptos-develop-mock-trigger to plain develop

Testing

  • bash .github/actions/get-core-ref/test_get_core_ref.sh
  • parsed integration-tests/templates/core.toml through the chainlink TOML types from feature/aptos-develop-mock-trigger
  • full smoke run is still blocked locally in this session because the Docker daemon is not running

@cawthorne cawthorne force-pushed the feature/aptos-off-aptos-init branch from 6b228fd to c44e7a7 Compare April 2, 2026 13:07
@cawthorne cawthorne marked this pull request as ready for review April 6, 2026 16:55
@cawthorne cawthorne requested review from a team as code owners April 6, 2026 16:55
@cawthorne cawthorne marked this pull request as draft April 7, 2026 13:16
@cawthorne cawthorne changed the title chore: move the aptos smoke workflow back to develop chore: move the aptos smoke workflow off aptos-init Apr 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant