feat!: support waiting from both standard streams

[DDtKey]

Might be useful to avoid duplication in some cases

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for testcontainers-rust ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	7305971
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/testcontainers-rust/deploys/668acd4896539900089b90c3
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-695--testcontainers-rust.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[ns-sjorgedeaguiar]

@DDtKey on a related note, am I right that it's not possible to wait for the command to complete? I see that we can wait for messages to be present in stderr/stdout, or for a specific exit code, but there doesn't seem to be a away to wait until the command finishes regardless of the outcome. There's the timeout option but it sleeps for the whole duration, not circuit breaking when the command is finished.

In my case I wrote a wrapper to execute a SQL statement, and wanted to print whatever error occurred when there was some. The exit code or expected message depended on what the caller was doing (e.g. inserting, deleting, etc) and the exit code could be anything. My workaround was to keep polling until an exit code was available.

[DDtKey]

Hi @ns-sjorgedeaguiar
Yes, that's correct. however I think more appropriate place for the discussion is #702

Where you also can find a workaround. But it's something we can support for sure