Skip to content

POC: Files for Agentic AI development#457

Closed
stejskalleos wants to merge 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
stejskalleos:ls/ai
Closed

POC: Files for Agentic AI development#457
stejskalleos wants to merge 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
stejskalleos:ls/ai

Conversation

@stejskalleos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ Disclaimer

  • Proof of concept, I have not tested it (yet) for actual development
  • Generated with multiple AI tools (Claude, Opus 4.6 & Gemini)
  • The files & instructions should be model/tool agnostic

Why are you introducing these changes? (Problem description, related links)

This PR is my test & POC for Agentic AI development.
I'd like to start this effort & discussion as part of the Foreman organization effort

What are the changes introduced in this pull request?

CONTRIBUTING_AI.md file with supporting files for:

  • Agents
  • Commands
  • Rules
  • Skills

Comments

Please take a look and share your thoughts, opinions, and comments. This PR is by no means complete; take it as a starting point for AI development efforts.

CONTRIBUTING_AI.md file with supporting files for:

- Agents
- Commands
- Rules
- Skills
@ehelms
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ehelms commented Apr 21, 2026

I've been seeing the convention to store agentic assets in .agents/ folder (e.g. `.agents/skills) and then using symlinks to support any particular clients that only look in their special directory.

I think you can put commands into skills. My understanding is they are treated the same now.

@ehelms
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ehelms commented Apr 21, 2026

I am glad to see an approach to this and some testing. I do think this is a lot for one PR in a space that we are still learning about. May I suggest this being a draft, and splitting off a basic, high-value skill and related assets into a separate focused PR to help us reviewing and learning?

@stejskalleos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ehelms #469

@stejskalleos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Replaced by #469

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants