Conversation
| [EngagementStatus.OPEN]: 'Open', | ||
| [EngagementStatus.PENDING_ASSIGNMENT]: 'Pending Assignment', | ||
| [EngagementStatus.ACTIVE]: 'Active', | ||
| [EngagementStatus.ON_HOLD]: 'On Hold', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[❗❗ correctness]
Ensure that EngagementStatus.ON_HOLD is defined in the EngagementStatus enum. If it is not defined, this could lead to runtime errors when attempting to access STATUS_LABELS[EngagementStatus.ON_HOLD].
| coverLetter: '', | ||
| email: '', | ||
| mobileNumber: undefined, | ||
| mobileNumber: '', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
Changing mobileNumber from undefined to an empty string ('') as a default value might lead to unexpected behavior if the rest of the codebase expects undefined to signify the absence of a value. Ensure that all parts of the application that handle mobileNumber can correctly interpret an empty string as 'no value'.
| shouldValidate: false, | ||
| }) | ||
| setValue('mobileNumber', userData.mobileNumber, { | ||
| setValue('mobileNumber', userData.mobileNumber ?? '', { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[correctness]
Using the nullish coalescing operator (??) to default userData.mobileNumber to an empty string ('') may cause issues if other parts of the application expect undefined to represent a missing value. Verify that this change aligns with the intended logic throughout the application.
| mobileNumber: yup | ||
| .string() | ||
| .required(requiredMessage) | ||
| .required('Mobile Number must be defined') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[maintainability]
The change from .defined() to .required('Mobile Number must be defined') is redundant since .required() already implies .defined(). Consider removing the .required() at line 50 to avoid redundancy.
https://topcoder.atlassian.net/browse/PM-4142