chore: Add block producer migration skills#27
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded a suite of operational documentation under Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(omitted — changes are documentation, small template defaults, and a UI metric card; no new multi-component control-flow to visualize) Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
skills/supernode-dashboard-port-forward.md (1)
22-24: Avoid local port collision between dashboard and Grafana examples.Both examples use local port
3000, which makes side-by-side debugging awkward. Use a different local port for Grafana.Proposed doc fix
### Grafana ```bash -kubectl -n control-plane port-forward service/grafana 3000:3000 +kubectl -n control-plane port-forward service/grafana 3001:3000</details> Also applies to: 36-38 <details> <summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In
@skills/supernode-dashboard-port-forward.mdaround lines 22 - 24, The two
port-forward examples conflict because both use local port 3000; update the
Grafana command (the line containing "kubectl -n control-plane port-forward
service/grafana 3000:3000") to use a different local port such as 3001 by
changing it to "kubectl -n control-plane port-forward service/grafana 3001:3000"
so it doesn’t collide with the supernode-dashboard command ("kubectl -n
control-plane port-forward service/supernode-dashboard 3000:3000"); apply the
same change to the second Grafana occurrence in the file.</details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents</summary>Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In@skills/supernode-dashboard-port-forward.md:
- Around line 26-30: The section heading/text says "forward the pod directly"
but the example command uses a deployment ("kubectl -n control-plane
port-forward deployment/supernode-dashboard 3000:3000"); update the doc so they
match by either changing the text to "forward the deployment directly" or
changing the command to target a pod (e.g., "kubectl -n control-plane
port-forward pod/ 3000:3000"); ensure the phrase and the command
reference the same object type (pod vs deployment) and keep the example name
"supernode-dashboard" consistent with the rest of the doc.
Nitpick comments:
In@skills/supernode-dashboard-port-forward.md:
- Around line 22-24: The two port-forward examples conflict because both use
local port 3000; update the Grafana command (the line containing "kubectl -n
control-plane port-forward service/grafana 3000:3000") to use a different local
port such as 3001 by changing it to "kubectl -n control-plane port-forward
service/grafana 3001:3000" so it doesn’t collide with the supernode-dashboard
command ("kubectl -n control-plane port-forward service/supernode-dashboard
3000:3000"); apply the same change to the second Grafana occurrence in the file.</details> <details> <summary>🪄 Autofix (Beta)</summary> Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR: - [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "4b0d0e0a-96d7-4f10-b296-3a18ea78f0b9"} --> Push a commit to this branch (recommended) - [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "ff5b1114-7d8c-49e6-8ac1-43f82af23a33"} --> Create a new PR with the fixes </details> --- <details> <summary>ℹ️ Review info</summary> <details> <summary>⚙️ Run configuration</summary> **Configuration used**: defaults **Review profile**: CHILL **Plan**: Pro **Run ID**: `1f282cfe-3f2b-4399-93f7-08e5185c1350` </details> <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 671862e942b023cfa8f1a5c9ba118492b31278c9 and 91d73dac7d3d97cc9bacc33da37f519e4539ab0e. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (8)</summary> * `skills/README.md` * `skills/cardano-block-producer-upgrade.md` * `skills/cardano-block-producer-verification.md` * `skills/cardano-node-metrics-access.md` * `skills/cardano-relay-setup.md` * `skills/kubernetes-extension-discovery.md` * `skills/kubernetes-storage-and-prereqs.md` * `skills/supernode-dashboard-port-forward.md` </details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
| If needed, you can also forward the pod directly: | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| kubectl -n control-plane port-forward deployment/supernode-dashboard 3000:3000 | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix object-type mismatch in the “pod directly” section.
Line 26 says “forward the pod directly,” but Line 29 forwards a deployment. Please make wording and command match.
Proposed doc fix
-If needed, you can also forward the pod directly:
+If needed, you can also forward the deployment directly:
```bash
kubectl -n control-plane port-forward deployment/supernode-dashboard 3000:3000</details>
<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @skills/supernode-dashboard-port-forward.md around lines 26 - 30, The section
heading/text says "forward the pod directly" but the example command uses a
deployment ("kubectl -n control-plane port-forward
deployment/supernode-dashboard 3000:3000"); update the doc so they match by
either changing the text to "forward the deployment directly" or changing the
command to target a pod (e.g., "kubectl -n control-plane port-forward
pod/ 3000:3000"); ensure the phrase and the command reference the same
object type (pod vs deployment) and keep the example name "supernode-dashboard"
consistent with the rest of the doc.
</details>
<!-- fingerprinting:phantom:triton:hawk:04de8889-5853-452b-a113-b60af168bf5c -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit