Skip to content

Conversation

@eggrobin
Copy link
Member

@eggrobin eggrobin commented May 23, 2024

See L2/24-131, Proposal to encode Arabic Crown Letters (حروف التاج), and https://github.com/unicode-org/sah/issues/353.

UTC-180-C22 Consensus: Provisionally assign 22 Arabic crown letter code points and one crown letter combining mark U+10ED9..U+10EEE, U+10EF9 in the Arabic Extended-C block as described in L2/24-131 [Ref. Section 3a of L2/24-166]

https://github.com/unicode-org/utc-release-management/issues/119

[183-C14] Consensus: Change the name of code point U+10EF9 provisionally assigned by 180-C22 from ARABIC CROWN to ARABIC MARK CROWN in response to feedback L2/25-071 item ID20250313143220 from Eduardo Marin Silva. [Ref. 3.1 in L2/25-091R]

[185-C40] Consensus: UTC accepts for encoding in Unicode 18.0 the following 321 Arabic, Armenian, Bengali, Cuneiform, Devanagari, Hebrew, Kana, Khitan, Latin, Mongolian, Phonetic and other symbol characters for which code points have previously been assigned:

  1. Arabic (39 characters—ref. 180-C22, 180-C26): 10EC9..10ECF, 10ED9..10EEE, 10EF0..10EF9
  2. Armenian (3 characters—ref. 179-C46): 0558, 058B..058C
  3. Bengali (1 character—ref. 180-C30): 0984
  4. Cuneiform numerals (12 characters—ref. 182-C3): 1246F, 12475..1247F
  5. Devanagari (1 character—ref. 182-C5): 11B0A
  6. Hebrew (1 character—ref. 182-C4): 05C8
  7. Kana (7 characters—ref. 180-C6, 182-C31, 183-C54, 184-C38): 1B123..1B125, 1B126, 1B127..1B128, 1B168
  8. Khitan (5 characters—ref. 184-C5): 18CD6..18CDA
  9. Latin (54 characters—ref. 181-C8, 181-C10, 182-C6, 182-C7, 182-C8, 182-C9, 183-C8): 2E60..2E63, A7DD, A7E2, AB6C..AB6D, 1DF57..1DF59, 1DF5A..1DF66, 1DF67, 1DF68..1DF81, 1DFCD..1DFCF
  10. Mongolian (1 character—ref. 178-C30): 1879
  11. Phonetic (114 characters—ref. 179-C55, 179-C59, 179-C60, 180-C32, 180-C33, 180-C34, 180-C35, 180-C36, 180-C37, 181-C33, 181-C34, 181-C35, 181-C36, 181-C45, 183-C10): 1ADE..1ADF, 1AEC..1AF0, 208F, 209D..209F, 107BB..107BF, 1DF1F..1DF24, 1DF2B..1DF2C, 1DF2D..1DF3A, 1DF3B..1DF3D, 1DF3E..1DF3F, 1DF40..1DF56, 1DFD0, 1DFD1, 1DFD2..1DFD7, 1DFD8..1DFE8, 1DFE9..1DFF2, 1DFF3..1DFF4, 1DFF5..1DFF9, 1DFFA..1DFFF
  12. Symbols (81 characters—ref. 178-C31, 178-C36, 178-C37, 180-C38, 180-C39, 180-C40, 181-C38, 181-C39, 181-C40, 182-C10, 182-C11, 183-C12, 183-C13, 184-C18): 20C2, 1CEF1..1CEF5, 1D127..1D128, 1D1EB..1D1F6, 1D1F7..1D1FE, 1D1FF, 1D250..1D255, 1D256..1D25A, 1D25B..1D25F, 1D260, 1D261, 1D262..1D27F, 1D280..1D281, 1F1AE, 1F7DA
  13. Tangut (2 characters—ref. 183-C7, 184-C4: 18D1F..18D20

Copy link
Contributor

@roozbehp roozbehp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, the proposal clearly mentions that the combining crown should be MCM. That seems to be missing from the changes here.

Copy link
Contributor

@roozbehp roozbehp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, apart from the "n > 17" comments.

roozbehp
roozbehp previously approved these changes May 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@roozbehp roozbehp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM then.

@markusicu markusicu added the ucd-δ-needs-revision have data, but UTC approved changes that need to be made label Apr 22, 2025
@eggrobin eggrobin removed the ucd-δ-needs-revision have data, but UTC approved changes that need to be made label Nov 11, 2025
@eggrobin eggrobin marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2025 12:35
@eggrobin eggrobin requested a review from roozbehp November 12, 2025 22:33
Copy link
Contributor

@roozbehp roozbehp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@eggrobin eggrobin merged commit 5879e56 into unicode-org:main Nov 12, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants