feat: check admin leave conditions (WPB-25277)

[sbakhtiarov]

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-25277

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-25277

What's new in this PR?

New use-cases for Admin-less groups handling feature.

• Check conditions for allowing or not allowing user admin to leave conversation
• Return a list of conversation members eligible for admin role promotion

[github-actions]

Test Results

0 tests   - 4 890   0 ✅  - 4 775   0s ⏱️ - 2m 44s
0 suites  -   803   0 💤  -   115 
0 files    -   803   0 ❌ ±    0 

Results for commit 32d070e. ± Comparison against base commit de33718.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 79.41176% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 61.61%. Comparing base (de33718) to head (32d070e).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...um/logic/feature/conversation/ConversationScope.kt	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
...rsation/CheckConversationLeaveConditionsUseCase.kt	88.88%	0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #4131      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      61.60%   61.61%   +0.01%     
  Complexity      4023     4023              
=============================================
  Files           2057     2059       +2     
  Lines          67321    67355      +34     
  Branches        6635     6649      +14     
=============================================
+ Hits           41475    41503      +28     
- Misses         23202    23206       +4     
- Partials        2644     2646       +2     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...eEligibleMembersForConversationAdminRoleUseCase.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...rsation/CheckConversationLeaveConditionsUseCase.kt	88.88% <88.88%> (ø)
...um/logic/feature/conversation/ConversationScope.kt	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update de33718...32d070e. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	feat/check-leave-conditions
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	microseconds (µs)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	716.72 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	512,966.91 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.inboxPagingDeepPageBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	103,045.47 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.inboxPagingFirstPageBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	99,336.44 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.localMarkAsReadBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	3,007.86 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.messagePagingDeepPageBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	22,589.82 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessageReadBenchmark.messagePagingFirstPageBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	10,460.18 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,238,598.44 µs
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	23,239.07 µs

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud