Skip to content

Conversation

@artemmufazalov
Copy link
Member

@artemmufazalov artemmufazalov commented Dec 3, 2025

CI Results

Test Status: ⚠️ FLAKY

📊 Full Report

Total Passed Failed Flaky Skipped
378 375 0 1 2
Test Changes Summary ⏭️2

⏭️ Skipped Tests (2)

  1. Scroll to row, get shareable link, navigate to URL and verify row is scrolled into view (tenant/diagnostics/tabs/queries.test.ts)
  2. Copy result button copies to clipboard (tenant/queryEditor/queryEditor.test.ts)

Bundle Size: ✅

Current: 62.34 MB | Main: 62.34 MB
Diff: 0.00 KB (0.00%)

✅ Bundle size unchanged.

ℹ️ CI Information
  • Test recordings for failed tests are available in the full report.
  • Bundle size is measured for the entire 'dist' directory.
  • 📊 indicates links to detailed reports.
  • 🔺 indicates increase, 🔽 decrease, and ✅ no change in bundle size.

@artemmufazalov artemmufazalov force-pushed the npm-10 branch 2 times, most recently from b4984f0 to 35b426d Compare December 3, 2025 11:41
@artemmufazalov artemmufazalov marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2025 11:43
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 3, 2025 11:43
Copilot finished reviewing on behalf of artemmufazalov December 3, 2025 11:44
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds Node.js and npm engine requirements to the package.json and regenerates the package-lock.json file with npm 10. The changes ensure that the project explicitly declares its runtime requirements and updates the lockfile structure to match npm 10's format.

  • Adds engines field specifying Node.js >=22.0 and npm ^10.9.2
  • Regenerates package-lock.json with npm 10, which updates peer dependency markers and package metadata
  • No functional code changes or dependency version updates

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
package.json Adds engines field to specify Node.js >=22.0 and npm ^10.9.2 requirements
package-lock.json Regenerated with npm 10, updating peer dependency markers and internal structure without changing dependency versions

package.json Outdated
"main": "dist/lib.js",
"engines": {
"node": ">=22.0",
"npm": "^10.9.2"
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The npm version constraint is overly restrictive. Using ^10.9.2 will only allow patch updates (e.g., 10.9.3, 10.9.4) but will exclude minor version updates (e.g., 10.10.x, 10.11.x) that typically include bug fixes and improvements.

Consider using ^10.0.0 to allow all npm 10.x versions, or at minimum >=10.9.2 if there's a specific feature requirement from 10.9.2.

Suggested change
"npm": "^10.9.2"
"npm": "^10.0.0"

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 file reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile

Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 file reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile

Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 file reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile

@artemmufazalov artemmufazalov added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 689a547 Dec 4, 2025
7 checks passed
@artemmufazalov artemmufazalov deleted the npm-10 branch December 4, 2025 07:34
@artemmufazalov artemmufazalov self-assigned this Dec 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants