Skip to content

Conversation

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor

@djoshy djoshy commented Jul 8, 2025

This PR adds:

  • A new feature gate for MCO-1007; whose goal is to support boot image updates to ControlPlaneMachineSets
  • A new MachineManagerMachineSetsResourceType enum for CPMS so they can be opted in for updates via the MachineConfiguration API object.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 8, 2025

@djoshy: This pull request references MCO-1805 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

This PR adds:

  • A new feature gate for MCO-1007; whose goal is to support boot image updates to ControlPlaneMachineSets
  • A new MachineManagerMachineSetsResourceType enum for CPMS so they can be opted in for updates via the MachineConfiguration API object.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 8, 2025

Hello @djoshy! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 8, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from JoelSpeed and everettraven July 8, 2025 16:11
@djoshy djoshy force-pushed the add-cpms-boot-image-updates branch from 18ab992 to 41adfe1 Compare July 8, 2025 21:21
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 8, 2025
@djoshy djoshy force-pushed the add-cpms-boot-image-updates branch from 41adfe1 to 870a065 Compare September 18, 2025 18:15
@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Sep 18, 2025

With openshift/cluster-control-plane-machine-set-operator#368 merged, we should hopefully have all the prerequisites to proceed with this feature. I've rebased this PR to fix merge conflicts, and I have also added a new rule to only allow All or None for the ControlPlaneMachineSet resources.

@djoshy djoshy force-pushed the add-cpms-boot-image-updates branch from 870a065 to 93e2839 Compare September 19, 2025 18:41
@djoshy djoshy force-pushed the add-cpms-boot-image-updates branch 3 times, most recently from 23f9a62 to e484a4c Compare September 30, 2025 19:06
@djoshy djoshy force-pushed the add-cpms-boot-image-updates branch from e484a4c to 75a1397 Compare September 30, 2025 19:06
@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Sep 30, 2025

/retest

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Oct 1, 2025

/test remaining-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2025

@djoshy: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test build
/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-2of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2
/test e2e-azure
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-upgrade
/test e2e-upgrade-out-of-change
/test images
/test integration
/test lint
/test minor-e2e-upgrade-minor
/test minor-images
/test okd-scos-images
/test unit
/test verify
/test verify-client-go
/test verify-crd-schema
/test verify-crdify
/test verify-deps
/test verify-feature-promotion

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-api-master-build
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-images
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-integration
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-lint
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-minor-e2e-upgrade-minor
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-minor-images
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-okd-scos-images
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-unit
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-client-go
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-crd-schema
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-crdify
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-deps
pull-ci-openshift-api-master-verify-feature-promotion
Details

In response to this:

/test remaining-required

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 7, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test e2e-aws-ovn
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-2of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-1of2
/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2
/test e2e-azure
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-upgrade
/test e2e-upgrade-out-of-change

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 7, 2025
@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Oct 7, 2025

/verified later

We'll verify this through openshift/machine-config-operator#5332, which updates the MCO to consume this API.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@djoshy: Only users can be targets for the /verified later command.

Details

In response to this:

/verified later

We'll verify this through openshift/machine-config-operator#5332, which updates the MCO to consume this API.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Oct 7, 2025

/verified later @ptalgulk01

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added verified-later verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria labels Oct 7, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@djoshy: This PR has been marked to be verified later by @ptalgulk01.

Details

In response to this:

/verified later @ptalgulk01

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 230d0e0 and 2 for PR HEAD 75a1397 in total

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Oct 7, 2025

/retest-required

@deepsm007
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-azure

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Oct 8, 2025

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Oct 8, 2025

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 3a4cc53 and 1 for PR HEAD 75a1397 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2025

@djoshy: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 75a1397 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c9bef43 and 0 for PR HEAD 75a1397 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 58cae3d into openshift:master Oct 9, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@djoshy djoshy deleted the add-cpms-boot-image-updates branch October 9, 2025 17:53
@djoshy djoshy restored the add-cpms-boot-image-updates branch October 9, 2025 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria verified-later

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants